Ms. Shifa Katutu - National Community Service (MIA)

Mr. Nathan Twinomugisha - Amnesty Commission (MIA)

Ms. Brenda Oyullu - NGO Board (MIA)

Ms. Betty Kyokunzire - Small Arms & Light Weapons (MIA)

H.W. Margaret Mutonyi - Judiciary

H.W. Festo Nsenga - Judiciary (Alternate)

Mr. Omita Robert - Uganda Prisons Service

Ms. Natukunda Aliyo - Uganda Prisons Service

Mr. Ronald Sekagya - Judicial Service Commission

Mr. Godfrey Salaamu Ngobi - Judicial Service Commission

Ms. Betty Khisa - Directorate of Public Prosecutions

Ms. Susan Okalany - Directorate of Public Prosecutions

Ms. Grace Katusiime - Ministry of Gender

Mr. Kato Arthur - Ministry of Gender (Alternate)

Ms. Miriam Nabatanzi- Uganda Registration Services Bureau (URSB)

Mr. Douglas Lukwago - Uganda Registration Services Bureau (URSB)

Ms. Ida Nakiganda - Uganda Human Rights Commission

Ms. Winnie Kabeije - Uganda Human Rights Commission

Mr. Roscoe Ssozi - Law Development Centre

Ms. Florence Nakachwa - Law Development Centre

Mr. George Omunyokol - LDC (Civil)

Mr. John Mugisha - ULS (Mugisha & Co. Advocates)Civil

Mr. Andrew Kasirye - ULS (Kasirye & Byaruhanga Co. Advocates (Civil Main)

Mr. James Nangwala - ULS (Land)

Mr. Peter Walubiri - ULS (Land)

Ms Deborah Gasana - ULS –Legal Aid Project (Family)

Mrs. Lydia Ochieng Obbo - ULS - (Family)

Mr. Oburu Odoi Jimmy - Department of Administrator General

Ms. Nalukenge Harriet - Department of Administrator General

Gender Justice

Efforts to develop a JLOS Gender Strategy have taken place, and a JLOS Gender Strategy is in draft. There is a genuine effort to ensure gender mainstreaming in the Sector’s objectives, programme and activities as well as in staffing and human resources.

Gender champions exist in the Sector with apparent commitment and value to address gender within the work of the Sector- the challenge for JLOS is to learn how to adopt a pragmatic and systematic approach to gender mainstreaming. SIP III presents this opportunity and will concretise progress in legislation, policy and analytical work improving the pace of transformation. JLOS will improve its collection and analysis of data, and capacity development in gender analysis to inform the establishment of priorities and the implementation of activities.


Justice for Children

Since JLOS SIP 1 in 2000, JLOS has engaged in discussions at various levels to ensure access to justice for all particularly the poor and vulnerable groups, children inclusive. However service delivery to children remained fragmented at institutional level. A number of promising initiatives have been limited in scope - mainly serving children in conflict with the law and over shadowing equally important claims of children in the justice system for instance, in the areas of management of estates, custody, guardianship, protection of victims of crime and related services. Many of the justice system practitioners have had to adopt a make “do approach” dictated by resource limitations, rather than need, priority or statutory and internationally ratified obligations. The gaps are most evident within the Probation and Social Welfare Services where policy, staffing and structural challenges have to be addressed in a systematic manner.

 The sector through the Judiciary is working to address issues of jurisdiction to handle children matters in alignment with the phasing out of Grade II Magistrates under the Professionalization of the Bench policy. The Sector has also focused efforts and resources on up scaling and harmonizing the implementation of good practices and concepts like diversion – that are only important and meaningful to children only if applied consistently across the system.

Through the Justice for Children Program, the Sector has been able to integrate all these pockets of good practices into an interrelated, coherent and integrated service for children, shifting approach from institution to system wide planning, implementation and accountability for results for children.


Land Justice

Land is a key strategic resource to Uganda’s population and is a core primary factor of agricultural production, ecosystem stability, and climate resilience. Prevalence of land conflicts at household level is high at 34.9% and is slightly higher amongst rural households (36%) compared to urban households (33%). Only 20% of land conflicts are not reported to any dispute resolution option. With a dispute resolution rate of 59.9% for land conflicts at first instance and an average dissatisfaction rate of only 13.3 % the land justice system is rated fair.

Though the majority of cases are handled in semi-formal fora, the sector is working on strengthening oversight and setting standards while clarifying mandates of the different fora. Taken together, the situation of the land administration environment has significant implications for the Justice, Law and Order Sector to regulate and govern relations relating to the management of water resources, food security, forests, natural resource management, human health, infrastructure, and livelihoods. Land related wrangles and conflicts continuously flow into the criminal justice system. This situation has the potential to affect the country’s development and growth trajectory.

The high rate of population growth together with poor environment management practices means that more pressure will be exerted on the natural resource base, even if only to maintain the current quality of life, much less to contribute to economic growth and deliver environmental benefits. The role of the Justice, Law and Order Sector to protect, promote and enforce the environmental legal, policy and regulatory framework working together with other sectors is important.

Legal aid services

While our legal system can be a powerful tool for remedying wrongs, it is also extremely complex and can be difficult to navigate without the help of a trained attorney. For those unable to afford an attorney, access to the court system and the justice it can provide are limited. For those who choose to represent themselves, court costs and filing fees can be a barrier to obtaining justice. It can also be difficult to find information on simple procedural issues, like when and where to file a lawsuit and what rights you have in court. Without equal access to the justice system, many poor Ugandans struggle with legal problems that negatively affect their livelihood, their children and families. Our justice system is only as strong as the weakest person it protects. Ensuring that poor people have equal access to the legal system is important not only for protecting their quality of life; it’s also essential for maintaining the quality of justice available to everyone in our society. 

Under the SDP IV, the Sector will seek to strengthen and extend the State Briefs scheme to support Chief Magistrates and ensure that fewer cases are dismissed for lack of representation. The Sector will specifically focus on building the capacity of Legal Aid Service Providers to serve the population and will also align the Pro Bono scheme and the State Brief Scheme, while at the same time ensuring availability of choice.

DOWNLOAD SDP IV

KAMPALA -- The Justice for Children Program (J4C) supported by the Justice, Law and Order Sector has been hailed as a champion for the cause of children in terms of children’s protection, rights and obligations. This was during the review of the J4C program held at Protea Hotel, Kampala on June 12 2014. The review was a stock-taking event to evaluate the programme for the last 2 years, identifying bottlenecks and challenges as well as map out strategies oriented toward ensuring proper delivery of justice services to children.

The Justice for Children steering committee under the Justice for Children Program is task force of the Sector charged with crafting a unified strategy for improving services for children in JLOS.

The Uganda Registration Services Bureau is an autonomous statutory body established by Chapter 210 Laws of Uganda in 1998. The Bureau was created to take over the functions of the Registrar General’s Office under the Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs. The Act came into force on the 16th of August, 2004 and the self-accounting status was granted in July, 2010. The bureau is governed by the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer is the Registrar General.

Section 4(2) of URSB Act stipulates that the Bureau shall, for the purpose of achieving its objectives, have the following functions:-

Carry out all registrations required under the relevant laws;

Maintain registers, data and records on registrations affected by the bureau and to act as a clearing house for information and data   on those registrations;

Evaluate from time to time the practicability and efficacy of the relevant laws and advise the Government accordingly;

Carry on research and also disseminate research findings in the fields covered by the relevant laws through seminars, workshops, publications or other means and to recommend to the Government any improvements in the relevant laws appearing to the Bureau to be required as a result;

Charge fees for any services performed by the Bureau;

Perform any other function or to carry out such other activity as may be conducive or incidental to the efficient discharge of its objects or as the Minister may, by statutory instrument, direct;

Act as the agent of the Uganda Revenue Authority in the collection of stamp duty under the Stamps Act in respect of any documents or other matter on or in respect of which stamp duty is required to be paid and connected with the functions of the bureau under this Act;

CLICK HERE to request URSB for information under the Access to Information Act (2005)

WEBSITE: www.ursb.go.ug